Pattye Benson

Community Matters

Month – February 2010

Tredyffrin Board of Supervisors Meeting, 2-8-10 . . . YouTube Video Part III: Citizen John Petersen

The next to take his turn to present comments was John Petersen. The audience witnessed an amazing exchange between John and Chairman Lamina and Supervisor Kampf. John attempted to ask questions of the supervisors but was quickly interupted by Lamina and Kampf. It was obvious that they had come to the meeting prepared to ‘take John on’ . It appeared to me that Lamina and Kampf were not about to let John make his comments without intervention. Although John tried to ‘plow’ on through, at one point Lamina is heard to say that John would not be allowed to speak again. The behaviour of these 2 elected officials calls in to question a citizens right to freedom of speech.

The interchange between John and Lamina and Kampf is one that all residents need to watch; YouTube video clip, Part III: Citizen John Petersen

Tredyffrin Board of Supervisors Meeting, 2-8-10 . . . YouTube Video Part II: Christine Johnson

One of the most moving moments of the Board of Supervisors Meeting was when Mt. Pleasant resident Christine Johnson took her turn to speak. Christine eloquently spoke of her community, Mt. Pleasant as not being a sidewalk to nowhere as is often referred to by Supervisor Olson. Christine is a research librarian and she put hours in to research, providing copies of minutes from Board Meetings, Planning Commission meetings, STAP meetings, etc. Please watch Christine’s passionate delivery of information . . . and please watch as virtually no response is offered from Chairman Lamina.

Please watch this video clip: YouTube Video Part II: Christine Johnson

Tredyffrin Board of Supervisors Meeting, 2-8-10 . . . YouTube Video Part 1: The Apology of Lamina, Kampf & Richter

The Board of Supervisors Meeting on February 8 was important for many reasons. I wrote about the meeting in my post, United in their Resolve, Residents Speak Out. Many residents attended that Board of Supervisors meeting and I know that many watched at home. But I thought it was important to capture some of the important commentary of that evening, so my husband Jeff has kindly put together sections of the supervisors and citizens comments from that meeting and is in the process of uploading them to YouTube. As they are uploaded I will post them on Community Matters. I added a new page to the front-page of Community Matters, If you look across the top, you will see a tab for YouTube Videos. Going forward, you will be able to locate all relative videos by clicking on that tab. Hopefully, this will make it easier for residents to review.

YouTube Part 1: Tredyffrin Township Supervisors Apologize . . . Lamina, Kampf & Richter Supervisors Lamina, Kampf and Richter make their apologies for the vote of January 25. Their apology is followed by citizen comment. First to speak is Dariel Jamieson, newly elected chair of the Tredyffrin Township Democrats. Ms. Jamieson speaks to the issue of Supervisors Olson and Lamina speaking disparagingly of Democrats in the newspaper, in emails and also at the January 25 board meeting. Supervisor Lamina had little response for Ms. Jamieson in regards to his actions.

Tomorrow is Valentine's Day . . . What Not to Give

Valentine’s Day is tomorrow. If you care enough to give a gift on Valentine’s Day, how bad can the gift really be? After all, it’s the thought that counts, isn’t it? Well, yes and no. The official day dedicated to declaring your love for that special someone strikes dread in the hearts of men and anticipation in the hearts of women everywhere. Valentine’s Day has become a multi-million dollar industry where traditional gifts of chocolates and cards are exchanged by thousands of couples. For those adventuresome few who stray off the traditional path, there are certain gifts that are guaranteed to put a damper on your Valentine’s Day romantic celebration.

As a gift giver on Valentine’s Day, it’s important to understand the gift should represent your emotional bond with the recipient. So, even if your beloved has been hinting for months that the very gift she would love to have for herself is a new wok, Valentine’s Day is not the time for that gift. Far better to cave to tradition and go the sentimental card and candy route on this day, and then next week surprise her with the wok, than to risk having her think you value her only for her skills in the kitchen.

This approach works perfectly when it is the woman on the receiving end of the Valentine’s Day gift. Women, being emotional creatures, love the idea that they are cherished and desired. Men, on the other hand, may prove to be a different story. Oh sure, men appreciate the token card or even candy, but they also understand the value of the good, old-fashioned sensible gift. If you present men with a new drill for Valentine’s Day he is less likely to feel unappreciated than a woman receiving a vacuum cleaner might feel. In fact, you may find that he is quite pleased to see that you understand his needs and have actually been listening when he talks about the tools he would like for his workshop.

Gifting cleaning supplies seem to be a common mistake unknowingly made by men. While a new vacuum cleaner or dishwasher may seem like a gift that will bring convenience to a hectic life, these gifts are better left for Christmas or birthdays. Women don’t want to be reminded of their cleaning duties on such a special day. Valentine’s Day should be used as a day for romance and love, not convenience and ease of life. Kitchen appliances such as blenders or dishes are not romantic either. Cooking, just like cleaning, is a chore to most women, and therefore being reminded of their expectations does not set well as a romantic gesture. On the other hand if you were to purchase a new oven or set of pots and pan, then surprise her with a romantic candlelit dinner made by you using these new items, it would be a perfect way to incorporate such gift into a romantic gesture any woman is sure to appreciate.

It is never a good idea to purchase any kind of exercise equipment or gym membership for a loved one as a Valentine’s Day gift. Although the gift of health is precious, it will probably be taken more as an insult. No one wants to be told on Valentine’s Day that they need to lose a few pounds, and that is precisely how most women will receive such a gift. Unless you can turn it into a couple’s membership and present it as a way to spend time together getting healthy or utilizing some of the fringe benefits of a health club membership.

Valentine’s Day is the symbolic day of honoring the one you love with a small token of your undying esteem and love. As such, any gift worthy of presenting on this day must speak of love, not practicality. The standard gifts of cards, candy, flowers and jewelry may seem to be overused and commonplace but, let’s face it, they do get the job done. Many women will “ooh” and “Ahh” over delectable chocolates, a favorite bouquet of roses or a sentimental card. These gifts have become traditional for a reason. Few women will elicit the same reaction to a vacuum cleaner or a new coffee pot.

In order to make sure you don’t turn this Valentine’s Day into one to forget, make sure you don’t give a gift worth forgetting. The worst Valentine’s Day gift . . . you’ve probably guessed it by now. Though many want all days of the year to be Valentines Day’s women expect men to give a gift to them at least on Valentine’s Day. Men, the absolute worst gift you can give on Valentine’s Day is ‘nothing’. Don’t even try explaining this one since words will be futile.

Happy Valentine’s Day . . .

Bringing Attention to our Small Business Community, State Representative Paul Drucker Chooses Paoli for Re-Election Campaign Office

State Representative Paul Drucker is kicking off his State House 157 re-election campaign and Paoli office opening this Monday, February 15. His new campaign office is located at 12 E. Lancaster Avenue, across the street from Starbucks and the Paoli Train Station.

Due to the economic downturn, Paoli, like so many areas of our community, has empty storefronts. Conditions for small business remain challenging. Taking one of those storefronts for his local campaign office provides Paul with continued visibility in the community; highlights the Paoli Train Station redevelopment project; and brings attention and awareness to Paoli’s small business community. By keeping the flow of business and energy in the neighborhood, everyone can play a vital role in regenerating the economic growth of Tredyffrin. I am looking forward to our community emerging from survival and in to the growth mode, ready to focus on the future again. Supporting the business community of Tredyffrin Township supports everyone. State Representative Drucker’s campaign office in the heart of Paoli will provide an opportunity for residents to understand the ongoing need for revitalization and encouragement of our township business community.

I applaud the choice of Paoli for State Representative Paul Drucker’s campaign office but would suggest that his website, www.votepauldrucker.com needs to be updated. I just checked and the last entry is November 2008, following his election to the State House.

Attorney-Client Privilege . . . Understanding the Relationship Between Elected Officials & Township Solicitor. . . Where Does that Leave the Residents?

I know that many residents in the audience at the February 8 Board of Supervisors Meeting were confused and frustrated when they would pose specific questions to our elected officials and receive no response. The supervisors would turn to the Township Solicitor Tom Hogan for an opinion on a legal question and he would say that he could not answer, invoking attorney-client privilege. In conversation with residents since the meeting, there has been much discussion on the attorney-client privilege shared between Mr. Hogan and the supervisors. I know Tom Hogan personally; he’s one of the good guys and I need to believe that he would have given the residents his opinion (if permitted). But the fact remains that the public has legal questions in regards to St. Davids Golf Club, the return of the escrow, precedent set by the vote, ongoing liability to the township and its residents, etc.

If we cannot receive answers from our elected officials or township solicitor, where do we take our unanswered questions? Do community members have to hire their own attorney to receive answers?

I was greatly interested to received the following information from a reader, JudgeNJury on the subject of attorney-client privilege. I do not know the identity of this reader, but I am guessing that he/she could be a municipal attorney. An interesting read.

JudgeNJury 2010/02/10 wrote:

Under an opinion issued by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court on Jan. 29, it is far from clear that Hogan’s invocation of attorney-client privilege is correct. A link to a detailed article discussing the case follows, but this quote from the article is the main point: “The court issued a per curiam order in Nationwide v. Fleming Friday, upholding a Superior Court ruling that attorney-client privilege only applies to information given to the attorney by the client, not the other way around.”

(http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1202441905939&Pa_High_Court_Justices_Cant_Agree_on_AttorneyClient_Privilege_Dispute).

In other words, there is a good argument to be made that the Supervisors can invoke the privilege to refuse to answer questions about what they told Hogan, but Hogan cannot invoke the privilege to refuse to answer questions about what he told the Supervisors. Personally, I think the court’s decision is absurd. But the law is the law.

After 86 Comments re $600K Offer to TE School Board, Community Matters is Starting a New Thread

The following post received 86 comments and I was just asked to start a new post, same topic. I guess it was becoming difficult to page through the comments. So here you go. We can call this one Part 2. If you click on the title below it is hyperlinked and will take you to the original post and the 86 comments. But all new comments should be made here and we can close out the other thread.

Question . . . Has our Local Teachers Union Made a ‘No Strings Attached’ Offer of $600K to the TE School Board?

New thread starting about the TESD budget, Teacher Union offer of $600K, Finance Meeting, program cuts, possible teacher layoffs. Teachers, residents, administrators, union leaders . . . let’s keep the good commentary going.

Radnor and Tredyffrin Townships . . . Home Rule Charter Issues and Troubling Behavior of Elected Officials

In 1975 the voters of Tredyffrin Township approved the adoption of a Home Rule Charter which tailored the structure of our local government to meet the Township’s current and future needs. The Charter became effective in January, 1976, coincidentally and most appropriately the Bicentennial of American Independence.

In the past, I have referenced problems with the Radnor Township’s elected officials. Since becoming president of Radnor’s Board of Commissioners a couple of months ago, John Nagle has continuously made headlines with his behavior, most recently his attempt to control free speech of the citizens. If you follow Radnor Township’s issues, a similiarity begins to surface when compared to the behavior of some of Tredyffrin’s elected officials (most specifically, Supervisors Lamina and Kampf at the last Board of Supervisors meeting.) I thought that this week’s As I See It article (written by a former Radnor Township Commissioner) in the Main Line Surburban offers interesting commentary . . . just substitute Radnor Township with Tredyffrin Township as you read it. Ms. Williams is concerned about Radnor Township’s reputation and the integrity of its elected officials. She speaks to issues concerning government transparency, public notification procedures, citizen free speech rights . . . any of this sound familiar?

As I See It: Public-comment plan is against spirit of Radnor’s home-rule charter

By Jeane B. Williams

On Nov. 2, 1976, the majority of the electors of Radnor Township, voting on that date, approved the adoption of the proposed Home Rule Charter, as it was submitted by the 11 members of the government study commission of the township, in its report dated May 4, 1976. The yes vote indicated that the charter would become effective (official) Jan. 1, 1977, under the conditions specified in the charter.

Listed among the advantages of the provisions of this document is #2: openness and responsiveness of township government.

The charter guarantees:

A. Open public meetings of the Board of Commissioners with opportunity for citizen discussion.

Because it does not state that a form of gag rule (time or term limit on speakers) is permitted to be imposed as a rule, especially on those opposed to the party-line agenda, does not make it acceptable. I would not support any change to the current open dialogue that follows the provisions and spirit of the Home Rule Charter.

B. Availability of advance meeting and agenda notices to interested citizens.

The purpose of this clause was to encourage public dialogue with the electorate.

C. Public notice, public availability and public discussion of proposed ordinances and proposed budgets prior to adoption.

First public notice of the above, when it appears on the agenda sheets the Friday before the Monday meeting, is not adequate study time.

D. Availability of all township records to interested citizens upon request.

The recent redaction of employee names from the salary list is a violation of the spirit and intent of the charter. The employee names are part of the township records and are paid through taxpayer dollars and are therefore public. The electorate should not be required to resort to requesting the names through a Pennsylvania Right to Know document request.

I will be the first to admit that I did not foresee Radnor Township citizens electing persons to office who do not recognize that Radnor Township has maintained its reputation as a desirable family living area. One of the contributing factors is that its public officials (until 2008) have presented and kept a respectable public reputation. If political vigilance has waned, please reread and remember you still have the HRC at your back! There are more do’s than don’ts in it because elected and appointed officials are expected to have integrity to themselves, their families, their neighbors and Radnor Township.

As one of the 11 home-rule charter study commissioners, I have grateful memories of the hours we spent together crafting a document that could be read and understood by men or women on the street, as well as school students, and also reflect the kind of governmental structure would continue to keep Radnor Township a present-day model of William Penn’s Green Country Town.

Jeane B. Williams is a former Radnor Township resident.

Township Building Closed Today & Tomorrow . . . Help Steve Norcini and His Public Works People . . . Please Stay Home

Just Received from Tredyfrin Township:

THE TOWNSHIP ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE IS CLOSED WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 10 AND THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 11 DUE TO INCLEMENT WEATHER.

Unless absolutely necessary, please stay off of the roads on Wednesday and Thursday to help the road crews finish the job of cleaning up after this massive storm. Your cooperation and patience is appreciated.

WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 10 PARK AND RECREATION BOARD MEETING HAS BEEN CANCELLED.

Police Phone: (610) 644-3221
Fax: (610) 644-5394
Dispatch: (610) 647-1440
Emergency: 9-1-1

Public Works Phone: (610) 408-3620
Fax: (610) 644-0937
After Hours Emergency: (610) 647-1441

Governor Rendell's Proposed Budget Includes $354 Million in Increased School Funding

Governor Ed Rendell released his 2010-11 budget proposal yesterday. His budget proposes over $11 billion of taxpayer funding for educational services, which includes an increase of $354 million for school funding. Several reasons were cited for the funding increase including advances in achievement scores. In Governor Rendell’s proposed budget, education support services would receive $31.8 million in funding; basic education spending would receive $9.5 billion, for students in pre-kindergarten through 12th grade; and $1.8 billion for higher education with nearly $424 million of that allotted for financial assistance for students. State-aided private schools – including Drexel University and the University of the Arts in Philadelphia – would lose all their funding under the proposal. The exception is the University of Pennsylvania’s veterinary school.

Pennsylvania Secretary of Education Gerald Zahorchak offered that Pennsylvania was leading the nation in achievement improvements. Mr. Zaharchak emphasized a focus on increasing enrollment at a pre-kindergarten level. He feels that that there is an adequacy gap between where students should be performing and where they are currently performing which needs to be corrected. Mr. Zaharchak is suggesting that the gap would need to be filled by taxpayer funded state-subsidies. Accordingly, more than 300 Pennsylvania school districts would require more than $2,000 of taxpayer funding per student from the state to close this gap.

The pressures faced by school districts will result in local property tax hikes unless the state continues its commitment to close the adequacy gap, the Governor said. “On average, it would take a 40-percent increase in local property taxes to generate the same investment as the state will contribute over the course of our multi-year funding formula,” the Governor said. “When the state pays its fair share, school districts can keep property tax increases to a bare minimum.”

Here is Pennsylvania Department of Education 2010-11 Budget if you would like to read the details.

In case you are interested, here is Governor Rendell’s Executive Budget 2010-11 if you would like to see the entire proposed budget.

Will Governor Rendell’s proposed state budget have an impact on TESD’s 2010-11 budget? Comments Anyone?

Community Matters © 2024 Frontier Theme