Just as land development projects are not created equal, neither are neighbors oppositions to these projects.
You may recall the abandoned Duffy property on Lancaster Avenue in Berwyn and the subsequent construction of Daylesford Crossing, an assisted living facility on the site. Daylesford Crossing was a long, drawn out redevelopment process that required approving a text amendment to permit senior living facilities as a by-right use in C-1 (commercial) zoning. Some argued at the time that the zoning change to permit senior living in C-1 was ‘spot-zoning’ to accommodate this specific project and others questioned what this would mean for future C-1 development in Tredyffrin Township.
Although there was major push-back from the Daylesford neighbors to the assisted living facility, the project was completed in 2015 and with the developer providing concessions to the immediate residents in the way of lighting, traffic flow, landscape buffering, etc. Daylesford Crossing was a turbulent situation with residual effects that some claim cost Michelle Kichline her reelection bid to the Board of Supervisors in 2014.
Now fast forward to Brightview Senior Living, a recently approved senior living land development project on E. Conestoga Rd. in Strafford. The project is located behind Devon Whole Foods, across from Nudy’s and next to the one-way underpass. (This is a very congested area, especially at lunchtime on that small section of E. Conestoga Road off of Lancaster Avenue).
Brightview Senior Living first surfaced of the Tredyffrin Township’s Planning Commission in April 2015. There was a preliminary discussion and sketch plan of an assisted living facility on properties located at 293, 301, 309 and 319 E. Conestoga Road – all in in the C-1 (Commercial) district. The facility was described as having a range of care and services, and “would consist of approximately 143 apartments (including independent/assisted living and dementia care).” There was no mention of length, width or height of building in the meeting minutes.
We next see Brightview Senior Living on the Zoning Hearing Board (ZHB) agenda in August 2015. The developer sought a variance to decrease required parking spots and increase the building height (from 4 floors to 5 floors). When asked if Homestead Road neighbors had been notified of the proposed project, David Holland (VP of Development for Brightview) responded that yes, neighbors received letter of introduction but that he had not heard back from anyone. In a recent email exchange between myself and Mr. Holland, he provided a copy of the draft introduction letter and a list of 8 Homestead homeowners that he said received the letter in April 2015.
A review of the notification list sent to residents from the township regarding the Zoning Hearing Board meetings indicates no Homestead Road names/addresses.
The Brightview Senior Living land development application was presented to the Planning Commission on January 21, 2016. At that meeting, we learned that the building would be 5-story and 196 beds. (The sketch plan discussion of April 2015 mentioned 143 apartments). As was the case for the ZHB meeting, the township’s list for notification for the Planning Commission meeting on the Brightview Senior Living project did not include names/addresses of Homestead Road residents.
The size and scope of this senior living facility is massive – In Tredyffrin, C-1 commercial zoning limits the building length to 160 ft. The Brightview building is 450+ ft., approximately three times the legal limit of C-1 buildings permitted in Tredyffrin. Tory Snyder, the Planning Commission chair raised concern over the overall length of the building. Other concerns included safety, parking, etc. With all the questions/concerns from the Planning Commissioners, you could assume a long process for the developer with input from the community and ultimately a scaled down final version.
On April 21, the Brightview Senior Living project was back in front of the Planning Commission seeking preliminary and final land development approval. The applicant presented a laundry list of waivers, all of which were unanimously approved with the exception of the length of the building. Again Ms. Snyder commented on the size of the building (450+ft. versus the 160 ft. legally permitted in C-1) but she represented the sole dissenting vote and that waiver too was passed.
In the end, the Planning Commission voted unanimously (6-0) to grant both Preliminary and Final land development approval for the gigantic 450+ft, five-story, 55-ft high building totally 181,000 sq. ft. on E. Conestoga. (As a reference point, Daylesford Crossing on Lancaster Ave. is approx. 80,000 sq. ft.) And again, the residents living on Homestead Road were not on the township’s notification list for the Planning Commission meeting.
The final approval information of the senior living project has recently made its way to neighboring Homestead Road residents, leaving them shaking their heads and wondering how this happened without any notification from the township during the process. When Matt Bauman, Director of Zoning for the township was asked by a Homestead resident, why they were not notified of the project, his response was to provide them with the following:
Per the requirements of Section 208-147 Notice of Public Hearing, E When the Zoning Hearing Board shall so order, by mailing notice thereof to the owner if his residence is known or to the occupier of every lot on the same street within 500 feet of the lot or building in question and of every lot not on the same street within 150 feet of said lot or building. Failure to give the notice required by this subsection shall not invalidate any action taken by the Board.
The Township met the obligation of this section of the Code. Additionally, while there are no requirements for neighbor notification for Planning Commission applications but as a courtesy the Township followed the same requirement for the ZHB notices and sent notifications.
So … what does all this mean? It basically means that although the township could/should notify property owners on Homestead Road that live 150 ft. from the proposed development, they don’t have to legally! Using Chester County mapping tools available on www.chesco.org website, Ray Clarke measured that several neighboring Homestead Road properties are in the 150 ft. range from the Brightview property. Interestingly, these same Homestead Road residents have told me that they are routinely notified by the township of projects at the Devon Whole Foods shopping center and on Lancaster Ave — which are located much further away than Homestead Road properties than the Brightview project.
There’s no way for us to know whether the lack of township notification to Homestead Road residents was an oversight or deliberate. Or is it possible that some in the township didn’t want to see a repeat performance of neighborhood input on this project as was seen on the Daylesford Crossing project? In the end the result is the same – the Homestead Road neighbors were not given a voice in the process.
Brightview Senior Living is nearly 2-1/2 times the square footage size of Daylesford Crossing with twice the number of beds. The building will be located in a very congested commercial area on E. Conestoga Road, directly next to a one-way underpass and the Homestead Road neighbors were not part of the discussion! Amazing!
For the supervisors and township staff, I suggest an internal review of property owner notifications procedures on land development projects so that something similar doesn’t happen again. There needs to be strictly enforced guidelines for property owner notifications by the township, not randomly choosing when to notify.
In the case of the Brightview project, lack of notification to Homestead Road residents and therefore, lack of input int the process, has many in the neighborhood worried about their future property values. The Homestead Road residents were entitled to have a voice in this process. And there should be concern that the approval of the over sized building now will set precedent for future C-1 projects in the township.
What can be done at this point? As I see it, the outcome in this land development project is not the fault of the developer. The Brightview Senior Living developer reached for the moon and the stars and received it from Tredyffrin Township! However, In my communication with David Holland of Brightview, I found him to be straightforward and sincere, so I am hopeful that an appeal to him by the Homestead Road neighbors may bring some concessions for them in the way of landscape buffering, exterior lighting, etc. I have seen photos of Homestead Road backyards and during the fall/winter months – this new 5-story building will forever change their backyard viewscapes.
I suggest a meeting of Homestead neighbors with representatives from Brightview Senior Living, township staff and a couple of interested supervisors – although the project has received final approval from the township’s Planning Commission, maybe there is still some goodwill concessions that can be given to the neighbors.
11 CommentsAdd a Comment
Pattye, I don’t know if you attended the PC meeting when this was approved; but I was the only person to speak out against this application.
Yes, I was aware that you spoke out against the development project — based on its size, I think. Based on discussions with residents on Homestead Road, my guess is that Keene Hall would have been overflowing for the Planning Commission in they had known.
At some point, you all need to simply accept the fact that these projects are going to happen. Whether it is this one or the proposed project for station square, it’s all going to happen.
Interesting comment. I’m curious, how do you feel about notification to property owners by the township? Should adjacent property owners be notified of land development plans by the township staff or should it be the responsibility of the resident to track the applications?
Our residential community in Tredyffrin is changing. Where’s the public input on this change and how can we make sure that we are adequately notified of these major zoning changes? Don’t we have a right as a taxpayers to have this information before its too late?
I agree with your comment — all residents should feel confident that the township will notify them if a potential land development plan affects them. Notification procedures from the township to the residents need to have have an internal review.
How do I feel? Not sure that has anything to do with the matter. What I know is the section 208-146: Subsection E: Public Hearings. One is entitled to notice if they reside on the same street and are within 500 feet of the lot. If not on the same street, one is entitled to notice if they live within 150 feet of the lot.
There is also subsection D – which facilitates residents or associations receiving a notice of every meeting if they register for the current year.
As you said, this development is not the fault of the developer. Developers will try to get as much as possible. It’s no secret the township is extremely friendly to developers. If you don’t like how things are being done, elect new supervisors.
Again I ask, was the ordinance violated?
Was the ordinance violated here?
It doesn’t matter if the ordinance was violated (and yes, several of the houses on Homestead Rd. closest to Brightview are at the 150 ft. marker), there is a caveat provided which says, “Failure to give the notice required by this subsection shall not invalidate any action taken by the Board.” With the inclusion of that phrase, there is always an out so why bother to have the ordinance in the first place as it would appear to be meaningless.
So no, the ordinance wasn’t violated. According the zoning officer, the township met the requirements. As I said before, you need to accept these projects are going to happen. If you can’t, then move. It’s simply reality.
In a review of the Brightview Senior Living files at the township building, this document was included. For the record, the township staff added the 500 ft. and the 150 ft. markings to the map — I did not, this document is shown exactly as it is in the files. Sure looks like someone in the township thought that the Homestead Road was in the 150 ft. range, why else bother to mark the document. To the residents living on Homestead Road who have seen this document, it looks like they should have been notified by the township.
But it really doesn’t matter whether the Homestead Road property is 100 ft, 150 ft. or 1,000 ft. from the Brightview Senior Living property, the ordinance reads that failure to notify, will not change the outcome.
Unfortunately we will be seeing more and more of this – high density living complexes, especially along train lines, mixed use zoning and, Main Line life as we know it will be a thing of the past. Why is this happening? Agenda 21. What is Agenda 21? Google it. It’s important that you know