Have any of you flown since TSA (Transportation Security Administration) installed Advancing Imaging Technology (AIT) body scanners at Philadelphia International Airport? I had not really paid much attention to the body scanner news until I started to think about my own upcoming travel plans. In a few days, my husband and I will be heading off to Budapest, and in the midst of locating our passports and checking weather forecasts, the news of a ‘National Opt Out Day’ hit the headlines.
A grassroots organization, We Won’t Fly has big plans for November 24, the day before Thanksgiving — and the most-travelled day on the calendar. The airline boycott effort by the organization is organizing the National Opt Out Day; a mass x-ray scanner opt outs at airports around the nation.
We Won’t Fly wants to highlight the health and privacy dangers of TSA’s x-ray airport scanners. The protests to x-ray scanners range from privacy issues to concerns over increased radiation risks. Part of the privacy issue stems from what amounts to a nude picture of each traveler. For the record, the AIT scanner cannot store, transmit or print the body images; and they are deleted immediately once viewed and they have zero storage capacity.
Another variable for passengers is not knowing ahead of time if they will be required to pass through the AIT machines. Some airports require all passengers to pass through, others choose randomly, and still other airports (for example, Harrisburg International Airport) say the AIT machine is “optional”. Officials at Harrisburg International Airports rationalize that if passenger follows procedure and clears through the normal metal detector, the full body scanner is optional. If a passenger sets off the traditional metal detector, they have a chance to check their pockets and go through the metal detector once more before they are required to go through a held-held metal scanner.
I did a bit of checking and the AIT scanners have been at the Philadelphia International Airport for about 3 weeks, and by all reports Philadelphia has opted for a stricter process than some of the other airports. If the AIT is offered at the checkpoint lane that you are in, passengers will be asked to go through the AIT. At the Philadelphia Airport, if you opt out of the AIT scanner process, the passenger is required instead to go through an intimate pat down by a TSA officer, beyond the more traditional hand-held metal detector. I will not discuss the specific pat down details, except to say that for most this personal body touching is probably not a viable option. Here is the choices as I see it for travelers at Philadelphia Airport – (1) the full-body AIT scan; (2) the intimate pat down or (3) you do not fly.
Unite PA, a Lancaster-based Tea Party group is taking an extreme stand, claiming that the pat down and AIT machines are ‘sexual assault’, even if TSA is a government agency. Unite PA is promoting Opt Out Day on November 24, even if it means the traveler forfeiting their Thanksgiving by not traveling. As a heads-up, the Opt Out Day organization is planning a demonstration at Philadelphia airport for Nov. 24. Travel is going to be a nightmare during the upcoming holiday travel season and I think we can anticipate additional delay.
What I don’t understand is why do the airports vary on the AIT requirement . . . ? Where is the Federal regulation, why should some airports (Harrisburg) that have AIT scanners, be permitted to continue to use the traditional hand-held metal detector. The question I need to ask myself is why we are flying to Hungary from Philadelphia instead of Harrisburg! I would be interested in hearing from anyone who has traveled from Philadelphia International Airport in the last 3 weeks.
5 CommentsAdd a Comment
I just flew out of Philadelphia yesterday on Delta. There were no Full Body Scanners, just the old fashion metal detectors. Perhaps the Full Body Scanners are at only certain entry points, but they are not using them at the Terminal E entry point…yet.
As for how I feel about the Scanners, I have no privacy concerns since the image they take of you only looks like a chalk outline of your body that has been colored yellow.
I would, however, like to know more about the potential health consequences from being scanned. I notice that the Pilot’s Union is recommending to its membership to avoid Full Body Scanners due to the potential health risks. (On a side note: Never saw the logic of making Pilots go through security since they already have control of the airplane and can do anything they want with it.)
Thank you — this is encouraging information. I’m all for the use of the vintage hand-held metal scanner! Although my husband (who has had both of his knees ‘done’) thinks the idea of a full-body scanner is great in that the machine will make his trip through security much quicker!
First of all The image scanners TAKE A FULL NUDE PICTURE which is saved and often shared to other agencies.
The chalk outlines are for demonstration purposes only and YES there are significant radiation and health risks with every pass.
Secondly they do not assist in catching terrorist nor finding hidden weapons. They are a money making scheme and designed to fool the mass sheep population. Do your research and opt out.
This is not Nazi Germany
They just announced on the news today that Pilots will no longer need to go through the security scanning. Now that is a decision by the TSA that makes sense. Afterall, what were they afraid a Pilot might do…try to hijack the plane he or she is flying?
No dispensation for the rest of us, however. Full Body Scanners and Full Body Cavity searches are still on the horizon.
For the record, your statement below is incorrect.
Quote: “For the record, the AIT scanner cannot store, transmit or print the body images; and they are deleted immediately once viewed and they have zero storage capacity.”