TE School Board Candidates for Tredyffrin, Region 1:
The TE School Board candidates were asked to answer the following question in 500 words or less.
Although there are many important issues facing the TE School District, what one issue will you focus on should you be elected? As a school board director, what in your background, experience or education prepares you to help with this specific issue.
The four candidate responses follow below in alphabetical order according to last name. If your question and/or comment is for a specific candidate, please refer to that individual by name so as not to confuse. Voters will select two of these candidates in November for the school board.
TE School Board Candidate Neal Colligan
Tredyffrin, East – Region 1
In Pennsylvania, the State is mandated to provide education to our children. Local municipalities are permitted some autonomy in operating educational franchises. This autonomy is centered on fiscal management and meeting established minimum standards…districts that fail come under State control. We achieve educational excellence in T/E for reasons schools succeed anywhere…engaged parents who value education, experienced professionals in the education function and a socio-economic demographic that promotes physical and mental health. T/E will continue to excel educationally because you (and I) will accept nothing less.
In selecting SB members, we should understand the power we give them. The Position we’re discussing regards the management of the local educational operation; largely relegated to business/organizational decisions and setting a local tax rate. Educational excellence is the over-riding mission but THIS JOB is very specific. The inalienable right of the SB Member is to levy taxes…that affects every household and business in our community…THIS JOB is to assure the money is spent wisely. To “keep our schools great” or “make education better”, one should seek a position in the Education Department…curriculum is State mandated. To change the State’s funding of PSERs, the election venue would be State Representative. No person in this race is running for teacher, coach, administrator or good parent…those jobs feature direct contact with students.
I’ve been a Tredyffrin citizen for 20 years, attending School Board meetings for 5 years. From the “EIT Study” until today, I continue to educate myself on the operation of our District. I became an activist, speaking out was necessary. I’ve written in The Suburban many times regarding T/ESD finances, worked with a group of para’s/aides (at their request) to prevent their outsourcing, compelled the Board to release documents in the PA Open Records Office case Colligan vs T/E School District and continue to speak out on District issues that impact the community. I’ve worked with some great people…R’s and D’s and I’s. You can read about the positions I’ve advocated by searching this site. I am who I am and will continue to be…that’s my BIG promise.
The job is straight-forward. Deliver excellent education while operating efficiently….that’s what you deserve. Basics: be honest with the community in financial matters, welcome community input, adhere to established rules regarding transparency, focus on long-term viability of the system and be a good community citizen. Follow that path and the T/ESB won’t be constantly locking-horns with the public….TEMS fence…$5 MM garage…deficit budget/maximum tax increase/annual surplus cycle…outsourcing paras/aides…secret meetings that s/b public…shouting down community members…ALL can be in the past.
The attitude of “we know better”…”the community doesn’t need to know”…”they’re OUR schools” needs to change…THAT’s the #1 issue. I’m (uniquely???) qualified for THIS position…my accounting degree and MBA provide the education necessary for the task, years of educating myself prepare me for the position and I’m not too full-of-myself. My record is easy to access…watch the last/any video of a SB meeting, search here if inclined. Know the candidates: prepared?…share your values?…have leadership qualities? Change is coming… Thanks for listening.
TE School Board Candidate Roberta Hotinski
Tredyffrin, East – Region 1
As a geoscientist with a Ph.D. from Penn State who has spent the last 12 years working at Princeton University, I have spent most of my career in environments of educational excellence. After working in research, I moved into science management and communication, gaining extensive experience in project coordination and outreach to the public, including teacher professional development. I am currently the project manager for a $3.5 million/year ocean research initiative at Princeton (http://soccom.princeton.edu), which has given me additional experience in budgeting and consensus building among stakeholders.
As a scientist and parent with children in T/E, the single most important issue for me is preserving the quality of education that has made our district and our community so successful. If elected, I will work to guarantee that:
1. Spending is focused on students.
Recently the Board has committed to significant expenditures for capital projects that were not adequately justified to the community, including issuing $24 million in bonds for future projects and approving a $4.5 million facilities building. Funding decent and safe school buildings is important to the education program, but I would push to provide details on design and costs long before the meeting where a final vote is held. In addition, with over $30 million in our reserve fund I believe the Board should set a formal target for an adequate fund balance and develop strategies to limit the fund’s growth, such as committing surpluses to the following year’s operating expenses or increasing contributions to capital projects.
2. Our district is providing a competitive 21st century education.
I am concerned about the impacts of high stakes testing and would propose an internal review of how much time (and thus money) is being devoted to preparing for PSSA’s and Keystone Exams, plus the costs of remediation. I would also propose actively soliciting input from parents, teachers, and administrators on how current curricula and services are working for our students. As a particular area of interest, I would advocate strengthening partnerships with local universities and businesses to enhance STEM initiatives, including internships and after-school or summer programs.
3) Community members are active partners in improving our district.
I am committed to transparency and accountability, improved communication with the public, and mining community talent to help improve our schools. Specifically, I advocate
– Increasing two-way interaction at Board meetings, providing a mechanism for the public to ask questions between meetings, and publishing answers to public questions online
– Utilizing the expertise of our community members by creating citizen task forces or committees on complex issues
Residents of T/E deserve to feel confident that their tax dollars are being used wisely to provide a first-class education for every child in T/E. I believe my background and professional experience have prepared me well to safeguard the interests of both students and taxpayers, and I hope voters will agree. I am happy to answer questions and can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org or (484) 320-7470.
TE School Board Candidate Todd Kantorczyk
Tredyffrin, East – Region 1
My name is Todd Kantorczyk, and I’m a candidate for Region 1 T/E School Board Director. Serving on the board of a successful public school district like T/E requires directors to devote attention to a wide array of issues, many of which arise or shift significantly over the course of a school year. Accordingly, choosing a single issue above all others would not be an accurate reflection of how I intend to approach my responsibilities as a school board director if elected. With that said, I do believe a critical issue that will require much of my focus is ensuring that our district continues to provide a high quality education in an environment that demands consistent and transparent application of sound fiscal principles.
By all objective measures, we have excellent public schools. Our schools provide a wide array of benefits, all of which maintain our home values and help define us as an outstanding community where people want to move and live.
But it will be a challenge to maintain this excellence looking at the financial pressures facing the district. For example, the district will face almost $44 million in pension obligations over the next five years plus increases in unfunded mandates such as high stakes testing. At the same time, the primary sources of revenue for the district are taxes from residents and businesses, and recently the current board has asked the community to shoulder additional tax burdens. Accordingly, it is critical to ensure that: (1) funds are being managed in a fiscally responsible manner that adequately supports our excellent educational programs; and (2) requests for additional tax revenues are scrutinized and minimized.
My background and experience demonstrate that I am up for this task. For example:
- As the father of three current students in our district, I have a good sense of the issues schools face “on the ground” and the resources necessary for the district to deliver a high quality education;
- As an environmental attorney, I find innovative solutions to complex issues, including land use and development matters, through input and buy-in from wide groups of stakeholders;
- As a partner at a law firm, I understand the financial principles employed by Fortune 100 companies and small businesses; and
- As the child of a former school board president, I appreciate the important role that committed local leaders can play in making sure that public schools deliver for our children and the entire community.
Finally, I feel strongly that our neighbors can provide valuable input on this and many other issues. To that end, I would like to explore ways to increase public engagement and board transparency, including revising the procedure for interaction at monthly board and committee meetings. Moreover, I hope to advocate for more local control of our schools so that our community, rather than Harrisburg or Washington, can decide how to focus our educational resources.
For additional questions, please contact me at email@example.com or 484.832.8888. Thank you.
TE School Board Candidate Neill Kling
Tredyffrin, East – Region 1
I welcome the opportunity to speak to what I believe is the most pressing issue facing the T/E School Board: how to transition from the strong leadership of Dr. Waters and work with incoming Superintendent Gusick to keep our school district the best that it can be without overspending taxpayer money. This will require cooperation and foresight, and it should be undertaken by those with the humility to listen, the energy to think about where the district needs to be several years from now, and the courage to take steps now to make that possible future a reality.
The question is, will the Board sit back and let administrators decide most everything, merely providing a rubber stamp for their plans on the theory that educators know best what they need? Or will the board members be proactive, strategic and constructively critical partners, offering their own unique insights and always listening keenly to the parents and the taxpayers with the understanding that we all have to live with the consequences whether we use the schools or not? To my mind, the answer must be “no” to the former and “yes” to the latter. There are a great many things that educators are uniquely equipped to handle – e.g. the curriculum and the quality of the hired teachers – but there are many other areas in which the citizens and their representatives must have significant input – e.g. salaries and benefits, administrator to teacher ratio, how much we should provide for facilities and safety, and how all of that that impacts the taxpayers and the quality of life in the surrounding community. It appears that the District has managed the education side quite well, but there is always room for improvement on the other issues, along with earning the confidence of the citizens that their voices are being heard throughout.
What qualifies me to join the team of school directors in what promises to be a new era is the insight that comes from working cooperatively to manage a business enterprise. I am a graduate of Lafayette College and the Law School of the University of Pennsylvania. My day job is as a commercial litigator in Philadelphia with the law firm Harkins Cunningham LLP where I have spent 23 years representing companies large and small in lawsuits involving state and federal law. But I don’t just practice law, I also help manage my firm. I know what it means to meet a payroll, to lease real estate, to manage mostly wonderful and occasionally not-so-wonderful employees, and to do so in an environment that requires the consensus of a small group of very dedicated, intelligent people who are not afraid to speak their minds. I also understand neighborhood concerns about the aesthetic health of our community, having served on the Tredyffrin Zoning Hearing Board since 2007. I hope to continue my service by helping to set the future course for a school district that I have called home for over twenty years and to which I have and will entrust the secondary education of two of my children. I will be honored to have your vote to enable me to do so.
2 CommentsAdd a Comment
I don’t want to get carried away here, but these statements hold out an enticing prospect for change. It looks like all these candidates have something relevant to say, and qualifications for their candidacy. From small – but important – things like reforming the reviled Board Meeting Public Comment process, through promotion of STEM initiatives, to the reminders that “management of the local educational operation” is the issue and that we should be looking for a Board that is “proactive, strategic and constructively critical”.
The statements hint at differences in style, approach and focus that will give Region 1 voters a real choice. I must say that if my friend Neal gets the nod, it won’t be business-as-usual!
Thank-you for your responses. I am very interested in reading about your backgrounds, academic achievements and work experiences.
Keith Knauss, a UCF Board Member conducted a study: https://pattyebenson.org/2012/01/11/do-higher-teacher-salaries-equate-to-higher-pssa-sat-scores-not-according-to-research-study/
He discovered that “only two factors are significant – Parental Education and Poverty and those two factors alone can explain the bulk of the differences in academic achievement.” These factors are beyond the control of the District and Board Directors.
If the results of this study are accurate, which I have no reason to believe they are not, parents who create a culture of excellence will ensure that the high standards and values they live by and teach to their children will translate into academic success by the students in the TESD.
Therefore, I would like for Directors to focus on the Budget. As Todd stated, the district faces tens of millions of dollars in pension obligations over the next few years. 85% to 90% of the Budget is dedicated to salaries, healthcare and benefits. I understand to change state funding to PSER’s, the election venue would be State Representative as Neal states above, but we don’t have to add to the problem. I have read where many in District offices will make more money in their retirement years than they will make in their working careers. Tax payers who have no choice in never ending tax hikes to pay for this will not get the same.
As Mike McGann editor of the Unionville Times writes:
The pension mess: this issue has a multiplier effect. Aside from a rate spike that will be coming in each of the next few years were salaries to be flat, any pay hikes immediately boost the district’s pension contributions and it compounds over the next few years. In back of the envelope terms, for this coming contract, add in an extra .30 or more for every dollar of added salary, on a compounding basis. While that’s not entirely the district’s fault, it did benefit from paying next to nothing into the pension fund for some years back in the early 2000s and didn’t cut taxes or stash money for a rainy day. That’s a bit like paying the minimum on a large credit card bill for a couple of years, as it tends to cause problems down the road.
Current directors talked about the pension problem before the last election, and then granted HUGE raises and bonuses compounding the problem. How is this action tied to “keeping our schools excellent?” Parents keep our school excellent by modeling high standards to their highly motivated smart kids.
The money should go to the students.